§ 10.303. Should the employer use a Form CA-16 to authorize medical testing when an employee is exposed to a workplace hazard just once?
212 words·~1 min read·
/us/cfr/t20/s§ 10.303·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(a)Simple exposure to a workplace hazard, such as an infectious agent, does not constitute a work-related injury entitling an employee to medical treatment under the FECA. The employer therefore should not use a Form CA-16 to authorize medical testing for an employee who has merely been exposed to a workplace hazard, unless the employee has sustained an identifiable injury or medical condition as a result of that exposure. OWCP will authorize preventive treatment only under certain well-defined circumstances (see § 10.313).
(b)Employers may be required under other statutes or regulations to provide their employees with medical testing and/or other services in situations described in paragraph
(a)of this section. For example, regulations issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration at 29 CFR chapter XVII require employers to provide their employees with medical consultations and/or examinations when they either exhibit symptoms consistent with exposure to a workplace hazard, or when an identifiable event such as a spill, leak or explosion occurs and results in the likelihood of exposure to a workplace hazard. In addition, 5 U.S.C. 7901 authorizes employers to establish health programs whose staff can perform tests for workplace hazards, counsel employees for exposure or feared exposure to such hazards, and provide health care screening and other associated services.
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
U.S. Code
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 10.303
Should the employer use a Form CA-16 to authorize medical testing when an employee is exposed to a workplace hazard just once?
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources